The State of Maharashtra Thr. Toph. Pol. Sta. vs Akshay Vilas Wadekar Advocate - Wadekar V. L. — 842/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,326. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030068262020
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6822/2020
Filing Date
21-11-2020
Registration No
842/2020
Registration Date
21-11-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
403
Police Station
Tophkhana Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Thr. Toph. Pol. Sta.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Akshay Vilas Wadekar Advocate - Wadekar V. L.
Sanket Vilas Wadekar
Hearing History
Judge: 23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (No. 842/2020) in Marathi involving assault allegations. The court examined witness testimony from the complainant (a 61-year-old physician) who alleged he was beaten by accused Sanket Vilasrao Wadekar and others on 12/12/2016. The defense lawyer cross-examined the witness, and the court accepted the examination as complete on 17/02/2026. The order records the witness statements and cross-examination but does not contain a final judgment on guilt or bail determination—it appears to be an interlocutory order documenting trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (No. 842/2020) in Marathi involving assault allegations. The court examined witness testimony from the complainant (a 61-year-old physician) who alleged he was beaten by accused Sanket Vilasrao Wadekar and others on 12/12/2016. The defense lawyer cross-examined the witness, and the court accepted the examination as complete on 17/02/2026. The order records the witness statements and cross-examination but does not contain a final judgment on guilt or bail determination—it appears to be an interlocutory order documenting trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts