The State of Maharashtra vs Dattatray Balasaheb Datrange Advocate - Pokale H. B. — 1161/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 504, 506, 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030060012022

Filing Number

6000/2022

Filing Date

30-Jul-2022

Registration No

1161/2022

Registration Date

30-Jul-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

23-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

235

Police Station

Tophkhana Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 504, 506, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Balasaheb Datrange Advocate - Pokale H. B.

  2. 2.Subham Anil Datrange

    Adv. NIL

  3. 3.Akshay Gulab Datrange

    Adv. NIL

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon witness Priyanka Sandip Datrange to testify in the criminal case against Dattatray Balasaheb Datrange. The court found that her evidence was essential for just decision of the case as she was an eyewitness to the incident and an injured party, despite the investigation officer's failure to record her statement. Witness summons were accordingly issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 30-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 28-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 24-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 13-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 08-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 01-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 11-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 04-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 24-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 27-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 06-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 09-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 11-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 30-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 10-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 20-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 30-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 09-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 18-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 06-May-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 08-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 01-Jan-2024

    EvidenceView PDF

  43. 01-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 21-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 09-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 15-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 04-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 04-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 05-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 02-Jun-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 27-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 29-Mar-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 07-Feb-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 10-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 11-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 30-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1161/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon witness Priyanka Sandip Datrange to testify in the criminal case against Dattatray Balasaheb Datrange. The court found that her evidence was essential for just decision of the case as she was an eyewitness to the incident and an injured party, despite the investigation officer's failure to record her statement. Witness summons were accordingly issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case