The State of Maharashtra vs Deepak Murlidhar Ghaymukte Advocate - Vyavahare A. B. — 386/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030019402022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1939/2022
Filing Date
14-03-2022
Registration No
386/2022
Registration Date
15-03-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
30-7th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Nagar Taluka Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Deepak Murlidhar Ghaymukte Advocate - Vyavahare A. B.
Kiran Bappu Ghaymukte
Adv. Vyavahare A. B.
Amol Shahaji Gaikwad
Adv. Vyavahare A. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 30-7th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: This is a criminal case (G.R. Case No. 386/2022) involving theft of a three-wheeler motor, filed under IPC Section 379. The court examined Government Witness No. 4 (Assistant Police Officer Jabbbar Rahimkhan Pathan) on the investigation conducted. During cross-examination by the defense, critical contradictions emerged—the witness admitted that he did not prepare the crime scene panchnama at the police station, did not record witness statements as stated, failed to verify that the seized motor belonged to the complainant, and wrongly described the vehicle specifications in the seizure document. Verdict: Petition completely allowed with no further cross-examination required, as the prosecution's case was found to be riddled with procedural and evidentiary defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: This is a criminal case (G.R. Case No. 386/2022) involving theft of a three-wheeler motor, filed under IPC Section 379. The court examined Government Witness No. 4 (Assistant Police Officer Jabbbar Rahimkhan Pathan) on the investigation conducted. During cross-examination by the defense, critical contradictions emerged—the witness admitted that he did not prepare the crime scene panchnama at the police station, did not record witness statements as stated, failed to verify that the seized motor belonged to the complainant, and wrongly described the vehicle specifications in the seizure document. Verdict: Petition completely allowed with no further cross-examination required, as the prosecution's case was found to be riddled with procedural and evidentiary defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts