The State of Maharashtra vs Deepak Murlidhar Ghaymukte Advocate - Vyavahare A. B. — 386/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030019402022

Filing Number

1939/2022

Filing Date

14-Mar-2022

Registration No

386/2022

Registration Date

15-Mar-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

30-7th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

Nagar Taluka Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Murlidhar Ghaymukte Advocate - Vyavahare A. B.

  2. 2.Kiran Bappu Ghaymukte

    Adv. Vyavahare A. B.

  3. 3.Amol Shahaji Gaikwad

    Adv. Vyavahare A. B.

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    7th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    8th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: This is a criminal case (G.R. Case No. 386/2022) involving theft of a three-wheeler motor, filed under IPC Section 379. The court examined Government Witness No. 4 (Assistant Police Officer Jabbbar Rahimkhan Pathan) on the investigation conducted. During cross-examination by the defense, critical contradictions emerged—the witness admitted that he did not prepare the crime scene panchnama at the police station, did not record witness statements as stated, failed to verify that the seized motor belonged to the complainant, and wrongly described the vehicle specifications in the seizure document. Verdict: Petition completely allowed with no further cross-examination required, as the prosecution's case was found to be riddled with procedural and evidentiary defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    8th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    8th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    8th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    9th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  9. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    9th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  11. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  12. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  13. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  14. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  15. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  17. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  18. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  19. 05-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  20. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  22. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    11th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  23. 24-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  24. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  25. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  26. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  27. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  28. 15-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  29. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  30. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  31. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  32. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  33. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  34. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    15th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  35. 04-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  36. 30-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Warrant

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  37. 31-Dec-2022

    Charge

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  38. 15-Dec-2022

    Charge

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  39. 25-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  40. 18-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  41. 21-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 14-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 386/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: This is a criminal case (G.R. Case No. 386/2022) involving theft of a three-wheeler motor, filed under IPC Section 379. The court examined Government Witness No. 4 (Assistant Police Officer Jabbbar Rahimkhan Pathan) on the investigation conducted. During cross-examination by the defense, critical contradictions emerged—the witness admitted that he did not prepare the crime scene panchnama at the police station, did not record witness statements as stated, failed to verify that the seized motor belonged to the complainant, and wrongly described the vehicle specifications in the seizure document. Verdict: Petition completely allowed with no further cross-examination required, as the prosecution's case was found to be riddled with procedural and evidentiary defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case