Vrudheshwar Urban Multistate Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd. vs Jyoti Raju Shelar Advocate - Kulat Akshay B. — 1331/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments (amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030016332025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
01-02-2025
Filing Number
1632/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
1331/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
FIR Details
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vrudheshwar Urban Multistate Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd.
Adv. KALE GAURAV BHAUSAHEB
Respondent(s)
Jyoti Raju Shelar Advocate - Kulat Akshay B.
Hearing History
Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Steps
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Evidence Part Heard
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 12-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal case (FIR No. 1331/2025) under Section 351 BNS against Jyoti Rajesh Shelar for alleged misappropriation of funds by a cooperative society. The court examined the accused's responses to detailed questioning regarding loan disbursement procedures, fund transfers, bank deposits, and documentation. The order dismisses the petition, with the court finding insufficient evidence on most charges and directing further investigation into alleged financial irregularities and unauthorized fund transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal case (FIR No. 1331/2025) under Section 351 BNS against Jyoti Rajesh Shelar for alleged misappropriation of funds by a cooperative society. The court examined the accused's responses to detailed questioning regarding loan disbursement procedures, fund transfers, bank deposits, and documentation. The order dismisses the petition, with the court finding insufficient evidence on most charges and directing further investigation into alleged financial irregularities and unauthorized fund transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts