Federal Bank vs M/s Darvesh Poultry Feed and Poultry Material Supplier, A partnership Firm Advocate - NIL — 53/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH030007932026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2026
Filing Number
793/2026
Filing Date
14-01-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Federal Bank
Adv. NIL
Respondent(s)
M/s Darvesh Poultry Feed and Poultry Material Supplier, A partnership Firm Advocate - NIL
Shaikh Shahid S
Adv. NIL
Jabin Shahid Shaikh
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar, allowed Federal Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of secured assets (movable stock, machinery, and immovable property) valued at Rs. 5.3 crore from M/s Darvesh Poultry Feed after the borrower defaulted on repayment obligations totaling Rs. 4.66 crore despite a 60-day demand notice. A Court Commissioner was appointed to execute possession with police assistance if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar, allowed Federal Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of secured assets (movable stock, machinery, and immovable property) valued at Rs. 5.3 crore from M/s Darvesh Poultry Feed after the borrower defaulted on repayment obligations totaling Rs. 4.66 crore despite a 60-day demand notice. A Court Commissioner was appointed to execute possession with police assistance if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts