Mangaldip Multistate Urban Co.Op.Cr.So.Ltd. vs Jayshri Rakesh Lokhande Advocate - NIL — 611/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030007292025
e-Filing Number
11-01-2025
Filing Number
728/2025
Filing Date
20-Jan-2025
Registration No
611/2025
Registration Date
20-Jan-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
29-4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mangaldip Multistate Urban Co.Op.Cr.So.Ltd.
Adv. RASHINKAR AMIT VIJAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayshri Rakesh Lokhande Advocate - NIL
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
25-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
24-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
5th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
10-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
7th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
23-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
7th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM
-
28-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court ordered that summons be issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, based on the prima facie case established by the complainant. The case involves a cheque bounce matter, and the next hearing is scheduled for a future date in 2025. The court directed the accused to be served with process and directed compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 611/2025
The court ordered that summons be issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, based on the prima facie case established by the complainant. The case involves a cheque bounce matter, and the next hearing is scheduled for a future date in 2025. The court directed the accused to be served with process and directed compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts