Ashok Bansi Jadhav vs Balwant Khandu Kokate Advocate - NIL — 293/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Awaiting Notice Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHAH010080772025

e-Filing Number

09-12-2025

Filing Number

4564/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

293/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Ahmednagar

Judge

11-District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Bansi Jadhav

    Adv. Mutha R. K.

  2. 2.Santosh Bansi Jadhav

    Adv. Mutha R. K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balwant Khandu Kokate Advocate - NIL

  2. 2.Sufiyan Nisar Maniyar

    Adv. NIL

  3. 3.Rizwan Nisar Maniyar

    Adv. NIL

  4. 4.Imran Nisar Maniyar

    Adv. NIL

  5. 5.Bhagwan Bahurao Thorat

    Adv. NIL

  6. 6.Mahadev Bhanudas Jadhav

    Adv. NIL

  7. 7.Babasheb Bhanudas Jadhav

    Adv. NIL

  8. 8.Subhadrabai Ambadas Kadam

    Adv. NIL

  9. 9.Meena Bhskar Sumbe

    Adv. NIL

  10. 10.Arif Dawood Shaikh

    Adv. NIL

  11. 11.Iftekar Dawood Shaikh

    Adv. NIL

  12. 12.Mukhtar Dawood Shaikh

    Adv. NIL

  13. 13.Imtiyaz Dawood Shaikh

    Adv. NIL

  14. 14.Sahadu Shankar Kharade

    Adv. NIL

  15. 15.Rambhaabai Vithoba Kharade (Hajare)

    Adv. NIL

  16. 16.Popat Vithoba Kharade (Hajare)

    Adv. NIL

  17. 17.Ramesh Vithoba Kharade (Hajare)

    Adv. NIL

  18. 18.Dattatraya alias Dattu Vithoba Kharade (Hajare)

    Adv. NIL

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCA 293/2025 The District Court allowed appellants Ashok Bansi Jadhav and Santosh Bansi Jadhav's application for stay of the trial court's judgment and decree in Civil Suit 54/2021. The trial court had passed an ex-parte judgment declaring the appellants encroached on 14 rupees of agricultural land and ordered possession handed to the plaintiff within two months. The court granted the stay because executing the decree would render the appeal infructuous and cause irreparable loss to appellants who depend on the agricultural land for livelihood. Both parties are directed to argue the main appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 5 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 293/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA 293/2025 The District Court allowed appellants Ashok Bansi Jadhav and Santosh Bansi Jadhav's application for stay of the trial court's judgment and decree in Civil Suit 54/2021. The trial court had passed an ex-parte judgment declaring the appellants encroached on 14 rupees of agricultural land and ordered possession handed to the plaintiff within two months. The court granted the stay because executing the decree would render the appeal infructuous and cause irreparable loss to appellants who depend on the agricultural land for livelihood. Both parties are directed to argue the main appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case