Nanasaheb Yashavant Gholap(Legal Heir) vs Mohan alias Mohiniraj Bapurao Bhapkar Advocate - NIL — 260/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 96 r/w O41 R1. Status: R and P Ready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH010078012024
e-Filing Number
20-12-2024
Filing Number
4770/2024
Filing Date
20-Dec-2024
Registration No
260/2024
Registration Date
23-Dec-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Ahmednagar
Judge
11-District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nanasaheb Yashavant Gholap(Legal Heir)
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.1.
-
2.Kusum Nanasaheb Gholap
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.1.
-
3.Vijay Nanasaheb Gholap
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.1.
-
4.Chaya Subhash Chipade
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.1.
-
5.Sandip Nanasaheb Gholap
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.1.
-
6.Prajakta Pramod Hardas
Adv. Bhagwat S. B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohan alias Mohiniraj Bapurao Bhapkar Advocate - NIL
-
2.Suvarna Surendra Anand
Adv. NIL
-
3.Sudip Surendra Anand
Adv. NIL
-
4.Manish Surendra Anand
Adv. NIL
-
5.M/s. Saga Builders Pvt. Ltd. Thr.
Adv. NIL5.
-
6.Sunanda Bhagwantrao Deshmukh
Adv. NIL5.
-
7.Varun Bhagwantrao Deshmukh
Adv. NIL
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
R and P Ready
District Judge 5 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: RCA 260/2024 Stay Granted. The District Judge allowed the appellants' application and stayed the trial court's judgment and decree from Civil Suit 144/2019 (passed 08.10.2024) that granted a permanent injunction restraining them from obstructing the plaintiff's property possession. The court found a prima facie case exists regarding the legality of sale-deeds and physical possession, and that executing the decree before appeal decision would cause irreparable harm. Both parties are directed to argue the main appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 7 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 6 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 260/2024
Case Summary: RCA 260/2024 Stay Granted. The District Judge allowed the appellants' application and stayed the trial court's judgment and decree from Civil Suit 144/2019 (passed 08.10.2024) that granted a permanent injunction restraining them from obstructing the plaintiff's property possession. The court found a prima facie case exists regarding the legality of sale-deeds and physical possession, and that executing the decree before appeal decision would cause irreparable harm. Both parties are directed to argue the main appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts