Jyoti Dadasaheb Kate vs Ramnath Asaram Bhosale Advocate - Barhate V. M. — 241/2024
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH010041432024
e-Filing Number
28-06-2024
Filing Number
2541/2024
Filing Date
29-Jun-2024
Registration No
241/2024
Registration Date
22-Jul-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Ahmednagar
Judge
21-Adhoc District Judge-3 And Asj
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jyoti Dadasaheb Kate
Adv. Kakade A. V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramnath Asaram Bhosale Advocate - Barhate V. M.
-
2.Dadasaheb Rangnath Kate
Adv. NIL
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-3 And Asj
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-2 And Asj
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge 6 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Compliance
District Judge 6 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Compliance
District Judge 6 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Compliance
District Judge 5 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Compliance
District Judge 5 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2025
Compliance
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: Civil MA No. 241/2024 Outcome: The application was allowed. Respondent No.1's reply, which had been rejected by the previous "no reply" order dated 12.12.2024, is now accepted on record. However, Respondent No.1 must pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the Applicant as a condition. The court permitted the late filing in the interest of justice, allowing fair opportunity for the respondent to present his defence, despite the 436-day delay in filing the Miscellaneous Civil Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Apr-2025
Compliance
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Hearing
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Hearing
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Ex-Parte Order
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Order
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge 3 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 241/2024
Case Summary: Civil MA No. 241/2024 Outcome: The application was allowed. Respondent No.1's reply, which had been rejected by the previous "no reply" order dated 12.12.2024, is now accepted on record. However, Respondent No.1 must pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the Applicant as a condition. The court permitted the late filing in the interest of justice, allowing fair opportunity for the respondent to present his defence, despite the 436-day delay in filing the Miscellaneous Civil Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts