Babamiya Hasan Sayyad vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - AGP — 408/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHAH010015712026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

756/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

408/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Ahmednagar

Judge

20-Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Shevgaon Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),316(3),318(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Babamiya Hasan Sayyad

    Adv. Jamdar Rahul B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Cri. Bail Application No. 408/2026 The court rejected Babamiya Hasan Sayyad's pre-arrest bail application in a cheating case involving an alleged investment scheme fraud. Sayyad was accused of conspiring with others to defraud investors of ₹7,00,000 by falsely promising monthly returns from an agricultural import-export business. Although the informant and some depositors later filed no-objection pleas after settling disputes with the applicant, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary given the serious nature of the cheating allegations and the applicant's direct alleged involvement in misappropriating investor funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  6. 06-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  7. 01-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  8. 26-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 And Asj

  9. 12-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  10. 05-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  11. 02-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  12. 21-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  13. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 4 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 2 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  15. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 2 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  16. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 2 And Addl. Sessions Judge

  17. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. Bail Application No. 408/2026 The court rejected Babamiya Hasan Sayyad's pre-arrest bail application in a cheating case involving an alleged investment scheme fraud. Sayyad was accused of conspiring with others to defraud investors of ₹7,00,000 by falsely promising monthly returns from an agricultural import-export business. Although the informant and some depositors later filed no-objection pleas after settling disputes with the applicant, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary given the serious nature of the cheating allegations and the applicant's direct alleged involvement in misappropriating investor funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case