Pradip Prakash Vadagale vs Shri Renukamata Multistate Co. Op. Urban Cr. So. Ltd Advocate - Udas T. S. — 99/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Filing of Surety Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHAH010011762026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

569/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Ahmednagar

Judge

5-The District Judge-1 And Addl.Sessions Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Prakash Vadagale

    Adv. Chemate U. K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Renukamata Multistate Co. Op. Urban Cr. So. Ltd Advocate - Udas T. S.

  2. 2.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. AGP

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Filing of Surety

    The District Judge-1 And Addl.Sessions Judge

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Filing of Surety

    The District Judge-1 And Addl.Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Filing of Surety

    The District Judge-1 And Addl.Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary (Case 99/2026): Pradip Prakash Vadagale's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was partially allowed. The court suspended his sentence on condition that he deposit 20% of the fine/compensation amount and furnish personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000, finding the trial court wrongly applied legal presumptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (Case 99/2026): Pradip Prakash Vadagale's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was partially allowed. The court suspended his sentence on condition that he deposit 20% of the fine/compensation amount and furnish personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000, finding the trial court wrongly applied legal presumptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case