Bobby S Robert vs Vilma Juliet Advocate - Midhun Babu and K.K.Sebastian — 300196/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION 26 ORDER VII RULE 1. Status: For reports. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLWD120004112024
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-09-2024
Filing Number
300429/2024
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
300196/2024
Registration Date
23-09-2024
Court
Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Mananthavady
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate, Mananthavady
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bobby S Robert
Adv. Sundar Ram
Respondent(s)
Vilma Juliet Advocate - Midhun Babu and K.K.Sebastian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate, Mananthavady
For reports
For reports
For hearing on IA
For hearing on IA
Verify and report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | For reports | |
| 27-01-2026 | For reports | |
| 02-12-2025 | For hearing on IA | |
| 27-10-2025 | For hearing on IA | |
| 26-08-2025 | Verify and report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The Munsiff-Magistrate Court rejected the petitioner's application for a temporary mandatory injunction to restore access to his property via an allegedly obstructed pathway (Plaint B schedule property). The court found insufficient evidence at this stage to establish that the respondents violated the earlier interim injunction order or altered the property's status quo, noting that the advocate commissioner's inspection occurred only three days after suit institution, making findings inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The Munsiff-Magistrate Court rejected the petitioner's application for a temporary mandatory injunction to restore access to his property via an allegedly obstructed pathway (Plaint B schedule property). The court found insufficient evidence at this stage to establish that the respondents violated the earlier interim injunction order or altered the property's status quo, noting that the advocate commissioner's inspection occurred only three days after suit institution, making findings inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Mananthavady All courts →Explore other courts