CANARA BANK, NALLOORNADU BRANCH vs AMALJITH E.K Advocate - Ajith — 70/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION 26 READ WITH ORDER VII RULE 1. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLWD120001842025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

69/2025

Filing Date

10-04-2025

Registration No

70/2025

Registration Date

10-04-2025

Court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Mananthavady

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate, Mananthavady

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section SECTION 26 READ WITH ORDER VII RULE 1
IA/1/2025 Classification : Section CANARA BANK, NALLOORNADU BRANCHAMALJITH E.K
IA/2/2025 Classification : Section CANARA BANK, NALLOORNADU BRANCHAMALJITH E.K
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition To Set Aside Order / Decree Section AMALJITH E.KCANARA BANK, NALLOORNADU BRANCH

Petitioner(s)

CANARA BANK, NALLOORNADU BRANCH

Adv. RENIMOL MATHEW

Respondent(s)

AMALJITH E.K Advocate - Ajith

E. KAMALASANAN

Adv. Ajith

3. SHEELA KAMALASANAN

Adv. Ajith

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate, Mananthavady

09-03-2026

Written Statement

17-01-2026

For hearing on IA

20-12-2025

For Counter in IA

04-11-2025

For hearing on IA

13-10-2025

For hearing on IA

Interim Orders

10-04-2025
Order
10-04-2025
Order

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Mananthavady granted an interlocutory application by Canara Bank against three respondents, ordering conditional attachment of the property in dispute and directing the respondents to furnish security of Rs. 5,89,300. The court found that respondents were attempting to alienate the property to delay or obstruct execution of a potential decree. Notices were issued to respondents and revenue authorities, with the case returnable on 28.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Mananthavady granted an interlocutory application by Canara Bank against three respondents, ordering conditional attachment of the property in dispute and directing the respondents to furnish security of Rs. 5,89,300. The court found that respondents were attempting to alienate the property to delay or obstruct execution of a potential decree. Notices were issued to respondents and revenue authorities, with the case returnable on 28.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Mananthavady All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case