State of Kerala vs Vijesh Advocate - Christopher Jose, Christopher Jose — 300133/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,294(b)r/w63. Status: Issue notice. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Issue notice Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLWD100003542023

Filing Number

300331/2023

Filing Date

28-Apr-2023

Registration No

300133/2023

Registration Date

28-Apr-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate court II, Sulthanbathery

Judge

1-Judicial First class Magistrate 2

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

798

Police Station

Pulpally Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,294(b)r/w63

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijesh Advocate - Christopher Jose, Christopher Jose

  2. 2.Mobin

  3. 3.Ravi

  4. 4.Saneesh

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Issue notice

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    call on

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  4. 21-Mar-2026

    call on

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    remand Extended

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    82-83 Steps

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  12. 25-Oct-2025

    Order

    BAIL GRANTED The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Sulthan Bathery allowed the bail application of accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Mobin and Ravi) in CMP No. 928/2025. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 341, 324, and 294(b) read with Section 34 for alleged wrongful restraint, causing hurt with a broken beer bottle, and abusing the complainant. The court found that investigation was complete and further custody was unnecessary, releasing them on bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  14. 24-Oct-2025

    call with Cmp

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  15. 18-Oct-2025

    Repeat Notice

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  16. 30-Aug-2025

    NBW and notice to Suerities

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  17. 28-Jun-2025

    Issue Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  18. 10-Apr-2025

    Issue Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  19. 15-Feb-2025

    Hearing on charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  20. 30-Nov-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  21. 11-Oct-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  22. 09-Aug-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  23. 29-Jun-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  24. 16-Apr-2024

    Await warrent

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  25. 20-Feb-2024

    Await warrent

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  26. 18-Jan-2024

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  27. 24-Nov-2023

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  28. 08-Sep-2023

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First class Magistrate 2

  29. 16-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 28-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300133/2023

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL GRANTED The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Sulthan Bathery allowed the bail application of accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Mobin and Ravi) in CMP No. 928/2025. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 341, 324, and 294(b) read with Section 34 for alleged wrongful restraint, causing hurt with a broken beer bottle, and abusing the complainant. The court found that investigation was complete and further custody was unnecessary, releasing them on bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case