State of Kerala vs Vijesh Advocate - Christopher Jose, Christopher Jose — 300133/2023
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,324,294(b)r/w63. Status: Issue notice. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLWD100003542023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300331/2023
Filing Date
28-04-2023
Registration No
300133/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate court II, Sulthanbathery
Judge
1-Judicial First class Magistrate 2
FIR Details
FIR Number
798
Police Station
Pulpally Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vijesh Advocate - Christopher Jose, Christopher Jose
Mobin
Ravi
Saneesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First class Magistrate 2
Issue notice
call on
call on
remand Extended
repeat NBW
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Issue notice | |
| 30-03-2026 | call on | |
| 21-03-2026 | call on | |
| 19-03-2026 | remand Extended | |
| 09-03-2026 | repeat NBW |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Sulthan Bathery allowed the bail application of accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Mobin and Ravi) in CMP No. 928/2025. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 341, 324, and 294(b) read with Section 34 for alleged wrongful restraint, causing hurt with a broken beer bottle, and abusing the complainant. The court found that investigation was complete and further custody was unnecessary, releasing them on bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
BAIL GRANTED The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Sulthan Bathery allowed the bail application of accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Mobin and Ravi) in CMP No. 928/2025. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 341, 324, and 294(b) read with Section 34 for alleged wrongful restraint, causing hurt with a broken beer bottle, and abusing the complainant. The court found that investigation was complete and further custody was unnecessary, releasing them on bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts