Benny vs Elikutty and others — 200046/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 rule7. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLWD080000882023

For further hearing

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200093/2023

Filing Date

22-02-2023

Registration No

200046/2023

Registration Date

01-03-2023

Court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26 rule7
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section BennyElikutty and others

Petitioner(s)

Benny

Adv. Surendran.P.T.

Respondent(s)

Elikutty and others

Thomas V C

Chariyan

Chacko V C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate

30-03-2026

For further hearing

26-03-2026

For further hearing

25-03-2026

FOR HEARING

23-03-2026

FOR HEARING

21-03-2026

for evidence

Interim Orders

05-09-2023
Judgement

Summary: The suit for declaration of title to property based on a Will (No. 22/1999) was dismissed. Although the plaintiff filed an unchallenged proof affidavit and supporting documents (death certificates and family membership certificate), the court found that the critical Will document (Exhibit A1) was not properly proved in evidence. The court held that merely marking a document is insufficient; it must be formally proven, and without such proof, a decree of declaration could not be granted. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for declaration of title to property based on a Will (No. 22/1999) was dismissed. Although the plaintiff filed an unchallenged proof affidavit and supporting documents (death certificates and family membership certificate), the court found that the critical Will document (Exhibit A1) was not properly proved in evidence. The court held that merely marking a document is insufficient; it must be formally proven, and without such proof, a decree of declaration could not be granted. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case