Benny vs Elikutty and others — 200046/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 rule7. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

For further hearing Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLWD080000882023

Filing Number

200093/2023

Filing Date

22-Feb-2023

Registration No

200046/2023

Registration Date

01-Mar-2023

Court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 rule7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Benny

    Adv. Surendran.P.T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Elikutty and others

  2. 2.Thomas V C

  3. 3.Chariyan

  4. 4.Chacko V C

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  6. 21-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Verify and report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue notice

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  12. 05-Sep-2023

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The suit for declaration of title to property based on a Will (No. 22/1999) was dismissed. Although the plaintiff filed an unchallenged proof affidavit and supporting documents (death certificates and family membership certificate), the court found that the critical Will document (Exhibit A1) was not properly proved in evidence. The court held that merely marking a document is insufficient; it must be formally proven, and without such proof, a decree of declaration could not be granted. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 05-Sep-2023

    call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  14. 24-Aug-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  15. 16-Aug-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  16. 07-Aug-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  17. 26-Jul-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  18. 03-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  19. 03-Apr-2023

    call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  20. 01-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 22-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200046/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for declaration of title to property based on a Will (No. 22/1999) was dismissed. Although the plaintiff filed an unchallenged proof affidavit and supporting documents (death certificates and family membership certificate), the court found that the critical Will document (Exhibit A1) was not properly proved in evidence. The court held that merely marking a document is insufficient; it must be formally proven, and without such proof, a decree of declaration could not be granted. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case