Chamakalayil Santha vs Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan — 200007/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O 7 R1. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLWD080000252020
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200009/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
200007/2020
Registration Date
09-01-2020
Court
Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chamakalayil Santha
Adv. Eldo.V.P
Respondent(s)
Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Await report
Await report
Report on mediation
Issue notice
For Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Await report | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await report | |
| 20-01-2026 | Report on mediation | |
| 16-01-2026 | Issue notice | |
| 03-12-2025 | For Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery All courts →Explore other courts