Chamakalayil Santha vs Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan — 200007/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O 7 R1. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Await report Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLWD080000252020

Filing Number

200009/2020

Filing Date

07-Jan-2020

Registration No

200007/2020

Registration Date

09-Jan-2020

Court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O 7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chamakalayil Santha

    Adv. Eldo.V.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  9. 15-Sep-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  10. 05-Aug-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  12. 09-Jun-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  13. 20-May-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  14. 01-Apr-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  15. 04-Mar-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  16. 28-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  17. 17-Dec-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  18. 19-Nov-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  19. 13-Nov-2024

    For counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  20. 10-Oct-2024

    For counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  21. 09-Oct-2024

    For counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    For counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  23. 04-Sep-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  24. 13-Aug-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  25. 17-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  27. 02-Apr-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  28. 08-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  29. 08-Jan-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  30. 16-Oct-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  31. 11-Oct-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  32. 04-Sep-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  33. 18-Jul-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  34. 31-May-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  35. 12-Apr-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  36. 04-Apr-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  37. 27-Mar-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  38. 28-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  39. 21-Nov-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  40. 12-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  41. 20-Oct-2022

    Refer to Adalath

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  42. 17-Aug-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  43. 16-Mar-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  44. 03-Jan-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  45. 28-Sep-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  46. 02-Jun-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  47. 10-Mar-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  48. 06-Jan-2021

    call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  49. 10-Nov-2020

    call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  50. 16-Jun-2020

    OrderView PDF

  51. 16-Jun-2020

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  52. 16-Jun-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  53. 28-Mar-2020

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  54. 28-Feb-2020

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  55. 11-Feb-2020

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  56. 25-Jan-2020

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  57. 24-Jan-2020

    call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  58. 22-Jan-2020

    Written Statement

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  59. 09-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 07-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200007/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case