Chamakalayil Santha vs Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan — 200007/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O 7 R1. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLWD080000252020

Await report

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200009/2020

Filing Date

07-01-2020

Registration No

200007/2020

Registration Date

09-01-2020

Court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section S 26 O 7 R1
IA/11/2024 Classification : Section Chamakalayil SanthaOlikuzhiyil George

Petitioner(s)

Chamakalayil Santha

Adv. Eldo.V.P

Respondent(s)

Olikuzhiyil George Advocate - Aby.P.Cheriyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate

31-03-2026

Await report

09-03-2026

Await report

20-01-2026

Report on mediation

16-01-2026

Issue notice

03-12-2025

For Steps

Interim Orders

16-06-2020
Order
16-06-2020
Order

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court dismissed the interlocutory application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner (Chamakkalayil Santha). The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent from converting a footpath on her property into a motorable road, but the court found that the mud road in question is actually a public panchayath road not owned by the petitioner, with the advocate commissioner's report confirming its independent existence. The court determined there was no prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the respondent, and granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondent's right of access, consequently dismissing the petition with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Magistrate court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sulthanbathery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case