State of Kerala (Police) vs A1, George, S/O Thankappan. — 1200447/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,294(b)153. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 17th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLTV510004532019
Filing Number
1200447/2019
Filing Date
29-10-2019
Registration No
1200447/2019
Registration Date
29-10-2019
Court
Grama nyayalaya Parasala
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1030
Police Station
Parassala Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
A1, George, S/O Thankappan.
A2, Surendran,
Kamalabhai, D/O Selviyal Doral.
John Thilakraj, S/O Justin Martin.
Justin Thilakraj, S/O Justin Martin.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 06-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 30-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Parashala Village Court acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 153, and 294(b) on April 17, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of unlawful assembly and rioting, including lack of common criminal intent, absence of independent witnesses, contradictions in police witness testimonies, and insufficient evidence of creating public alarm. The defendants were discharged under CrPC section 255(1) and released unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Parashala Village Court acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 153, and 294(b) on April 17, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of unlawful assembly and rioting, including lack of common criminal intent, absence of independent witnesses, contradictions in police witness testimonies, and insufficient evidence of creating public alarm. The defendants were discharged under CrPC section 255(1) and released unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts