Joseph S/o Govindan vs Suresh Babu S/o Daamu — 1200284/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 337, 338. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLTV510002772023
Filing Number
1200284/2023
Filing Date
15-05-2023
Registration No
1200284/2023
Registration Date
15-05-2023
Court
Grama nyayalaya Parasala
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1089
Police Station
Parassala Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Joseph S/o Govindan
Respondent(s)
Suresh Babu S/o Daamu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Defence Evidence
82-83 Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 22-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | 82-83 Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Village Court of Parasala acquitted the defendant Suresh Babu of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was driving the KSRTC bus (KL-15-6760) that hit a motorcycle on 21.08.2014. The court noted critical gaps in evidence: the three prosecution witnesses could not identify the bus driver or vehicle number, and no documentary proof was provided establishing the defendant's identity as the bus operator at the time of the accident. Accordingly, the defendant was acquitted under CrPC Section 278(1) and discharged unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Village Court of Parasala acquitted the defendant Suresh Babu of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was driving the KSRTC bus (KL-15-6760) that hit a motorcycle on 21.08.2014. The court noted critical gaps in evidence: the three prosecution witnesses could not identify the bus driver or vehicle number, and no documentary proof was provided establishing the defendant's identity as the bus operator at the time of the accident. Accordingly, the defendant was acquitted under CrPC Section 278(1) and discharged unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts