Sheena, D/O Philomina. vs murukan, S/O Sadasivan. — 1200211/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 04th April 2026.

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTV510002132019

Case disposed

Filing Number

1200211/2019

Filing Date

16-04-2019

Registration No

1200211/2019

Registration Date

25-04-2019

Court

Grama nyayalaya Parasala

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

198

Police Station

Poovar Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 294(b),323
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Sheena, D/O Philomina.murukan, S/O Sadasivan
Crl.MP(Ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section murukan, S/O Sadasivan
Crl.MP(Ab)/2/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Sheena, D/O Philomina.murukan, S/O Sadasivan

Petitioner(s)

Sheena, D/O Philomina.

Respondent(s)

murukan, S/O Sadasivan.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari

04-04-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

Order/Judgement

18-03-2026

For further hearing

12-03-2026

FOR HEARING

28-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Village Court of Parashala acquitted the defendant Murukan of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified significant contradictions between the complainant's testimony and medical evidence, an 11-day delay in filing the complaint without adequate explanation, and lack of credible corroborating witnesses, leading to the defendant's acquittal and bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Village Court of Parashala acquitted the defendant Murukan of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified significant contradictions between the complainant's testimony and medical evidence, an 11-day delay in filing the complaint without adequate explanation, and lack of credible corroborating witnesses, leading to the defendant's acquittal and bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Grama nyayalaya Parasala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case