EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR vs RAJENDRAN Advocate - Ranjith chandran — 123/2025
Case under Kerala Abkari Act Section 8(1), 8(2), 67B. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 28th March 2026.
CP - COMMITAL PROCEEDING
CNR: KLTV500050892025
Filing Number
2686/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
123/2025
Registration Date
22-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Kattakkada
Judge
1-Jfcm Kattakada
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
Excise Circle
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR
Adv. Shiny Mol V O
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJENDRAN Advocate - Ranjith chandran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jfcm Kattakada
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Kattakada First Class Magistrate committed the case against Rajendran to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram under Section 232(a) BNSS. Rajendran was accused of possessing 8 liters of illegal arrack in a scooter with intent to sell, violating the Kerala Abkari Act. The magistrate found the offences exclusively triable by the Sessions Court and ordered the case records be forwarded accordingly, with the accused directed to appear before the Sessions Court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue notice
Jfcm Kattakada
-
27-Feb-2026
Call on
Jfcm Kattakada
-
19-Feb-2026
Call on
Jfcm Kattakada
-
10-Feb-2026
Appearance of Accused
Jfcm Kattakada
-
16-Dec-2025
Await summons
Jfcm Kattakada
-
24-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2025
Summary: The Kattakada First Class Magistrate committed the case against Rajendran to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram under Section 232(a) BNSS. Rajendran was accused of possessing 8 liters of illegal arrack in a scooter with intent to sell, violating the Kerala Abkari Act. The magistrate found the offences exclusively triable by the Sessions Court and ordered the case records be forwarded accordingly, with the accused directed to appear before the Sessions Court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts