SURESHKUMAR vs VIJAYAKUMAR — 103167/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTV500046742023

Filing Number

103167/2023

Filing Date

28-Oct-2023

Registration No

103167/2023

Registration Date

28-Oct-2023

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Kattakkada

Judge

1-Jfcm Kattakada

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESHKUMAR

    Adv. E BABU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYAKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jfcm Kattakada

  3. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kattakada dismissed Sureshkumar's cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 NI Act) against Vijayakumar on March 13, 2026. The court found that despite being issued notice and granted multiple opportunities, the complainant repeatedly remained absent and unrepresented, demonstrating lack of inclination to proceed. The complaint was dismissed under Section 204 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Jfcm Kattakada

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    For Steps

    Jfcm Kattakada

  6. 15-Sep-2025

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Jfcm Kattakada

  7. 06-May-2025

    Issue Summons

    Jfcm Kattakada

  8. 25-Oct-2024

    Issue Summons

    Jfcm Kattakada

  9. 02-Aug-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Jfcm Kattakada

  10. 29-Feb-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Jfcm Kattakada

  11. 18-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 28-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103167/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kattakada dismissed Sureshkumar's cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 NI Act) against Vijayakumar on March 13, 2026. The court found that despite being issued notice and granted multiple opportunities, the complainant repeatedly remained absent and unrepresented, demonstrating lack of inclination to proceed. The complaint was dismissed under Section 204 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case