Ameer vs Anilkumar V S Advocate - SUDHAKARAN NAIR K — 300485/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O.4,6,7. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV470007812023
e-Filing Number
08-12-2023
Filing Number
872/2023
Filing Date
08-Dec-2023
Registration No
300485/2023
Registration Date
08-Dec-2023
Court
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Judge
1-Munsiff, Varkala
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ameer
Adv. SABEER A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anilkumar V S Advocate - SUDHAKARAN NAIR K
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: 300485/2023 The Munsiff Court of Varkala allowed Ameer's petition (I.A. 1/2023) on 13 March 2026. The court found that denying the petition would prevent the petitioner from enjoying the fruits of any favorable decree and noted the respondent Anilkumar V.S. failed to furnish security. The conditional attachment order was made absolute until disposal of the suit, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
27-Nov-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
17-Nov-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
17-Sep-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
26-Jun-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
24-Feb-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
20-Nov-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
15-Nov-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
23-Sep-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
03-Jul-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Varkala
-
05-Mar-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
19-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
05-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
15-Dec-2023
Objection
Munsiff, Varkala
-
08-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 300485/2023
Case Summary: 300485/2023 The Munsiff Court of Varkala allowed Ameer's petition (I.A. 1/2023) on 13 March 2026. The court found that denying the petition would prevent the petitioner from enjoying the fruits of any favorable decree and noted the respondent Anilkumar V.S. failed to furnish security. The conditional attachment order was made absolute until disposal of the suit, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts