Shefeelabeegum vs Muneera Advocate - Jobin P.S — 3000320/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV470005222023

Issues

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-08-2023

Filing Number

524/2023

Filing Date

07-08-2023

Registration No

3000320/2023

Registration Date

07-08-2023

Court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala

Judge

1-Munsiff, Varkala

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section ShefeelabeegumMuneera
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section ShefeelabeegumMuneera
Ia/8/2025 Classification : Prosecution Petition Section ShefeelabeegumMuneera
Ia/9/2025 Classification : Application to Add Party Section Shefeelabeegum

Petitioner(s)

Shefeelabeegum

Adv. SHAJILAL S

Respondent(s)

Muneera Advocate - Jobin P.S

Nasimudheen

Adv. SALIYA BABU M

Muhammed Illyas

Adv. SALIYA BABU M

Sirajudheen

Adv. SALIYA BABU M

Shahjahan

Adv. SALIYA BABU M

Salim

Adv. SALIYA BABU M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Varkala

12-03-2026

Issues

19-01-2026

Return of notice

20-11-2025

Issues

27-10-2025

For commission report

25-10-2025

For Objection and hearing

Interim Orders

19-06-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Shafeela Beegum (plaintiff in OS 320/2023) has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie possession of the disputed properties through documentary evidence or advocate commission, and thus could not meet the requirements for granting temporary injunction. The respondent's counterclaim—that she is the court-appointed guardian of the adopted son Jouhar, in whose name land taxes are paid and possession certificates issued—prevailed. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Shafeela Beegum (plaintiff in OS 320/2023) has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie possession of the disputed properties through documentary evidence or advocate commission, and thus could not meet the requirements for granting temporary injunction. The respondent's counterclaim—that she is the court-appointed guardian of the adopted son Jouhar, in whose name land taxes are paid and possession certificates issued—prevailed. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case