Sobhana vs Saji Advocate - PRADEEP KUMAR G K — 300349/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV470005092019

for evidence.

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

150/2019

Filing Date

23-10-2019

Registration No

300349/2019

Registration Date

23-10-2019

Court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala

Judge

1-Munsiff, Varkala

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Petition Section SobhanaSaji
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Petition to Remove from List Section SajiSobhana
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section SajiSobhana

Petitioner(s)

Sobhana

Adv. SUMANAS. H

Respondent(s)

Saji Advocate - PRADEEP KUMAR G K

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Varkala

08-04-2026

for evidence.

17-03-2026

For cross examination.

12-03-2026

For cross examination.

25-02-2026

Listed to

06-02-2026

Orders in IA

Interim Orders

25-01-2023
Order

Case Summary: In this property dispute (OS 349/2019) from the Munsiff Court, Varkala, the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs on 25 January 2023. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiffs' property, destroying boundary walls and fencing, or widening a neighboring pathway by encroaching on their land. The defendant was also ordered to pay the costs of the suit. The defendant failed to appear despite summons and was proceeded against ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this property dispute (OS 349/2019) from the Munsiff Court, Varkala, the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs on 25 January 2023. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiffs' property, destroying boundary walls and fencing, or widening a neighboring pathway by encroaching on their land. The defendant was also ordered to pay the costs of the suit. The defendant failed to appear despite summons and was proceeded against ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case