Baby sarojam vs Mani Advocate - Nahas.F — 300468/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV470005002017
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
416/2017
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
300468/2017
Registration Date
18-11-2017
Court
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Judge
1-Munsiff, Varkala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baby sarojam
Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR S
Bhaskarapillai
Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR S
Respondent(s)
Mani Advocate - Nahas.F
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Varkala
Listed to
BCF and steps
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Listed to |
| 10-02-2026 | BCF and steps |
| 09-02-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 15-12-2025 | Orders in IA |
| 18-10-2025 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 468/2017 Outcome: Suit DECREED in favor of plaintiffs The Munsiff Court ordered the defendant (Mani) to vacate the plaintiffs' property within 30 days and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as damages for destruction and trespass. The defendant was permanently restrained from entering the property. The court found the plaintiffs held valid title via gift deed and rejected the defendant's adverse possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 468/2017 Outcome: Suit DECREED in favor of plaintiffs The Munsiff Court ordered the defendant (Mani) to vacate the plaintiffs' property within 30 days and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as damages for destruction and trespass. The defendant was permanently restrained from entering the property. The court found the plaintiffs held valid title via gift deed and rejected the defendant's adverse possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts