Baby sarojam vs Mani Advocate - Nahas.F — 300468/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV470005002017

Filing Number

416/2017

Filing Date

18-Nov-2017

Registration No

300468/2017

Registration Date

18-Nov-2017

Court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala

Judge

1-Munsiff, Varkala

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baby sarojam

    Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR S

  2. 2.Bhaskarapillai

    Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mani Advocate - Nahas.F

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Varkala

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  6. 18-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Varkala

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Varkala

  11. 19-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Varkala

  12. 17-Feb-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  13. 19-Nov-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  14. 05-Oct-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  15. 17-Aug-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  16. 29-Jun-2024

    Restored

    Munsiff, Varkala

  17. 29-Jun-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  18. 29-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  19. 13-Jul-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 468/2017 Outcome: Suit DECREED in favor of plaintiffs The Munsiff Court ordered the defendant (Mani) to vacate the plaintiffs' property within 30 days and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as damages for destruction and trespass. The defendant was permanently restrained from entering the property. The court found the plaintiffs held valid title via gift deed and rejected the defendant's adverse possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 13-Jul-2023

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Varkala

  21. 12-Jul-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  22. 10-Jul-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  23. 07-Jul-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  24. 18-Mar-2023

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Varkala

  25. 09-Nov-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  26. 12-Aug-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  27. 09-Jun-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  28. 22-Dec-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  29. 19-Nov-2021

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Varkala

  30. 26-Oct-2021

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Varkala

  31. 06-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Varkala

  32. 29-Jun-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  33. 17-Mar-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff, Varkala

  34. 01-Mar-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff, Varkala

  35. 01-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  36. 22-Dec-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  37. 22-Dec-2020

    Restored

    Munsiff, Varkala

  38. 01-Feb-2019

    OrderView PDF

  39. 01-Feb-2019

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Varkala

  40. 25-Jan-2019

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  41. 18-Jan-2019

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  42. 09-Jan-2019

    Judge on leave / duty

    Munsiff, Varkala

  43. 26-Nov-2018

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Varkala

  44. 05-Nov-2018

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  45. 31-Oct-2018

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  46. 11-Oct-2018

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff, Varkala

  47. 14-Sep-2018

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Varkala

  48. 03-Sep-2018

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  49. 20-Aug-2018

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Varkala

  50. 09-Aug-2018

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  51. 31-Jul-2018

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Varkala

  52. 20-Jul-2018

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  53. 20-Jun-2018

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  54. 22-May-2018

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff, Varkala

  55. 22-Jan-2018

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  56. 15-Dec-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  57. 01-Dec-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff, Varkala

  58. 18-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 18-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300468/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 468/2017 Outcome: Suit DECREED in favor of plaintiffs The Munsiff Court ordered the defendant (Mani) to vacate the plaintiffs' property within 30 days and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as damages for destruction and trespass. The defendant was permanently restrained from entering the property. The court found the plaintiffs held valid title via gift deed and rejected the defendant's adverse possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case