Sushama Ramesan vs Subhash Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR S, SUNIL KUMAR S — 300297/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Return of summons. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV470004122024

Return of summons

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

29-07-2024

Filing Number

1190/2024

Filing Date

29-07-2024

Registration No

300297/2024

Registration Date

29-07-2024

Court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala

Judge

1-Munsiff, Varkala

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Section Suresh
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Section Subhash
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Petition Section Sushama RamesanSubhash
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Sushama RamesanSubhash

Petitioner(s)

Sushama Ramesan

Adv. VINOD K S

Valsala

Adv. VINOD K S

Sumetha M

Adv. VINOD K S

Respondent(s)

Subhash Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR S, SUNIL KUMAR S

Madhuri

Adv. SUNIL KUMAR S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Varkala

12-03-2026

Return of summons

12-12-2025

For Steps

15-10-2025

Return of summons

04-08-2025

Return of summons

25-02-2025

Return of summons

Interim Orders

29-07-2024
Order

Summary: In I.A. 1/2024 in O.S. 297/2024 before the Court of the Munsiff, Varkala on 29th July 2024, the court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the petitioners. The court restrained the respondents from making further constructions encroaching into the petitioner's B and C schedule properties and from committing any act of waste on those properties until further orders. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In I.A. 1/2024 in O.S. 297/2024 before the Court of the Munsiff, Varkala on 29th July 2024, the court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the petitioners. The court restrained the respondents from making further constructions encroaching into the petitioner's B and C schedule properties and from committing any act of waste on those properties until further orders. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Varkala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case