Sushama Ramesan vs Subhash Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR S, SUNIL KUMAR S — 300297/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Return of summons. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV470004122024
e-Filing Number
29-07-2024
Filing Number
1190/2024
Filing Date
29-Jul-2024
Registration No
300297/2024
Registration Date
29-Jul-2024
Court
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Judge
1-Munsiff, Varkala
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sushama Ramesan
Adv. VINOD K S
-
2.Valsala
Adv. VINOD K S
-
3.Sumetha M
Adv. VINOD K S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subhash Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR S, SUNIL KUMAR S
-
2.Madhuri
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR S
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Return of summons
Munsiff, Varkala
-
12-Dec-2025
For Steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
15-Oct-2025
Return of summons
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Aug-2025
Return of summons
Munsiff, Varkala
-
25-Feb-2025
Return of summons
Munsiff, Varkala
-
01-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
13-Sep-2024
Return of notice
Munsiff, Varkala
-
13-Aug-2024
Return of summons
Munsiff, Varkala
-
29-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: In I.A. 1/2024 in O.S. 297/2024 before the Court of the Munsiff, Varkala on 29th July 2024, the court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the petitioners. The court restrained the respondents from making further constructions encroaching into the petitioner's B and C schedule properties and from committing any act of waste on those properties until further orders. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 300297/2024
Summary: In I.A. 1/2024 in O.S. 297/2024 before the Court of the Munsiff, Varkala on 29th July 2024, the court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the petitioners. The court restrained the respondents from making further constructions encroaching into the petitioner's B and C schedule properties and from committing any act of waste on those properties until further orders. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts