Parthukonam Bharathi Mangalam Bhagavathy Represented by President Sathyadevan S/o Gopalan vs Binil S/o Appukuttan Advocate - SABEER — 281/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Kerala Amendment) Act,1987 Section 26 Order IV VI VII Rule 1 and Order 1 Rule 8. Status: Orders in IA. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV470003732025
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
479/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
281/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Judge
1-Munsiff, Varkala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parthukonam Bharathi Mangalam Bhagavathy Represented by President Sathyadevan S/o Gopalan
Adv. JAYAPRAKAS R
Parthukonam Bharathi Mangalam Bhagavathy Temple represented by Secretary Jeji
Adv. JAYAPRAKAS R
Sudhakaran S/o Gangadharan
Adv. JAYAPRAKAS R
Chithrangadan S/o Vasudevan
Adv. JAYAPRAKAS R
Respondent(s)
Binil S/o Appukuttan Advocate - SABEER
Shyni D/o Sreerenjini
Adv. SABEER
Boban S/o Vasudevan
Adv. SABEER
Sathyapalan S/o Nanoo
Adv. SABEER
Baiju S/o Appukuttan
Adv. SABEER
Suresh Raman S/o Raman
Adv. SABEER
Sheela W/o Ajaya Ghosh
Adv. SABEER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Varkala
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 26-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 26-02-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 25-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Ad-interim injunction GRANTED. The Court of the Munsiff, Varkala, granted an interim injunction restraining the counter-petitioners from disturbing the administration of the Bharathi Mangalam Bhagavathy Temple and conduct of festivals until further orders, finding a prima facie case established. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Ad-interim injunction GRANTED. The Court of the Munsiff, Varkala, granted an interim injunction restraining the counter-petitioners from disturbing the administration of the Bharathi Mangalam Bhagavathy Temple and conduct of festivals until further orders, finding a prima facie case established. The petitioner was directed to comply with Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts