shajahan vs naseer Advocate - Nahas.F — 300271/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV470002462017
Filing Number
300271/2017
Filing Date
24-Jun-2017
Registration No
300271/2017
Registration Date
24-Jun-2017
Court
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Judge
1-Munsiff, Varkala
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.shajahan
Adv. SUMANAS. H
-
2.sheeba
Adv. SUMANAS. H
Respondent(s)
-
1.naseer Advocate - Nahas.F
-
2.shahida beevi
Adv. Nahas.F
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Apr-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
13-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
13-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
16-Dec-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
18-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
09-Sep-2025
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
11-Jul-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: OS 271/2017 - Shahjahan & Sheeba v. Nazeer & Shahidha Beevi Outcome: Petition dismissed. No order as to costs. Key Facts: Defendants (Nazeer and Shahidha Beevi) filed an interlocutory application seeking to stay proceedings in OS 271/2017, arguing the subject matter was identical to a previously instituted suit (OS 258/2017) involving the same parties. They claimed proceeding with both suits would waste judicial time and risk conflicting judgments. Court's Decision: The Munsiff Court rejected the stay petition, finding that while the parties were identical, the properties involved were different—located in separate resurvey numbers (81 vs. 103) in Varkala village. Section 10 of the CPC requires identity of subject matter, not merely parties. The court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
22-May-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
01-Apr-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
12-Mar-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
22-Feb-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Feb-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
31-Jan-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
28-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
18-Dec-2024
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
16-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
11-Oct-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
05-Sep-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
14-Aug-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
30-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
19-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
18-Jun-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
28-May-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Apr-2024
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
03-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
27-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
25-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
19-Jan-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
17-Jan-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
10-Jan-2024
Objection
Munsiff, Varkala
-
15-Dec-2023
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
30-Nov-2023
Call with IA
Munsiff, Varkala
-
20-Nov-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
07-Oct-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
21-Sep-2023
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
16-Sep-2023
For evidence
Munsiff, Varkala
-
07-Sep-2023
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
29-May-2023
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
24-Mar-2023
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
19-Jan-2023
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
17-Oct-2022
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
03-Sep-2022
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
08-Jun-2022
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Apr-2022
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
01-Dec-2021
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
01-Nov-2021
Adjourned
Munsiff, Varkala
-
22-Sep-2021
Adjourned
Munsiff, Varkala
-
24-Jun-2021
No sitting notified
Munsiff, Varkala
-
26-Mar-2021
Listed to
Munsiff, Varkala
-
04-Feb-2021
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
14-Dec-2020
Adjourned
Munsiff, Varkala
-
29-Sep-2020
Adjourned
Munsiff, Varkala
-
23-Jul-2020
Adjourned
Munsiff, Varkala
-
03-Feb-2020
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
16-Nov-2019
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
30-Sep-2019
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
02-Sep-2019
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
21-May-2019
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Varkala
-
01-Jan-2019
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
31-Oct-2018
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff, Varkala
-
15-Sep-2018
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff, Varkala
-
07-Aug-2018
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
06-Jul-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
10-Apr-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff, Varkala
-
28-Mar-2018
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
27-Feb-2018
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
31-Jan-2018
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
25-Nov-2017
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
17-Nov-2017
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
08-Aug-2017
Call on
Munsiff, Varkala
-
03-Aug-2017
For Hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
11-Jul-2017
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff, Varkala
-
24-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 300271/2017
Case Summary: OS 271/2017 - Shahjahan & Sheeba v. Nazeer & Shahidha Beevi Outcome: Petition dismissed. No order as to costs. Key Facts: Defendants (Nazeer and Shahidha Beevi) filed an interlocutory application seeking to stay proceedings in OS 271/2017, arguing the subject matter was identical to a previously instituted suit (OS 258/2017) involving the same parties. They claimed proceeding with both suits would waste judicial time and risk conflicting judgments. Court's Decision: The Munsiff Court rejected the stay petition, finding that while the parties were identical, the properties involved were different—located in separate resurvey numbers (81 vs. 103) in Varkala village. Section 10 of the CPC requires identity of subject matter, not merely parties. The court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts