SI of police kazhakuttom vs Nandakumar Advocate - Siju K Unnithan — 501475/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 29th April 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTV450032142016

Case disposed

Filing Number

501475/2016

Filing Date

23-08-2016

Registration No

501475/2016

Registration Date

23-08-2016

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Attingal

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II ATTINGAL

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1049

Police Station

Kazhakkoottam Police Station

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 379,34

Petitioner(s)

SI of police kazhakuttom

Respondent(s)

Nandakumar Advocate - Siju K Unnithan

vishnu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II ATTINGAL

29-04-2026

Disposed

25-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

17-04-2026

No sitting notified

07-04-2026

For further hearing

01-04-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Order

Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Attingal acquitted accused Nandakumar and Vishnu of theft charges under IPC Section 379 r/w 34 on April 29, 2026. The court found no evidence linking them to the motorcycle theft, noting the motorcycle was never recovered, there were no eyewitnesses, a 9-day delay in filing the complaint was unexplained, and the investigating officer admitted the accused were arrested without any evidence. The accused were released and their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Attingal acquitted accused Nandakumar and Vishnu of theft charges under IPC Section 379 r/w 34 on April 29, 2026. The court found no evidence linking them to the motorcycle theft, noting the motorcycle was never recovered, there were no eyewitnesses, a 9-day delay in filing the complaint was unexplained, and the investigating officer admitted the accused were arrested without any evidence. The accused were released and their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Attingal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case