State of Kerala (Police) vs PRATHEESH — 145/2026

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1988 (Amendment 2015,2019) Section 185,185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.No(TVM-PS-Pothencode) - Pothencode Police Station

CNR: KLTV440074612025

e-Filing Number

25-12-2025

Filing Number

1036/2025

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Attingal

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Attingal

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1036

Police Station

Pothenkodu Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1988 (Amendment 2015,2019) Section 185,185
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATHEESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The First Class Magistrate Court at Attingal convicted accused Pratheesh of offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 281 and Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 185 (rash/negligent driving and drunk driving). The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a fine; in default of payment, he must undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Attingal

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Attingal

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The First Class Magistrate Court at Attingal convicted accused Pratheesh of offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 281 and Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 185 (rash/negligent driving and drunk driving). The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a fine; in default of payment, he must undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case