Santhakumari vs Saritha Advocate - THATTATHUMALA S ANILKUMAR — 401586/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV440020682015
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
405869/2015
Filing Date
17-10-2015
Registration No
401586/2015
Registration Date
17-10-2015
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Attingal
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santhakumari
Adv. SHAJI V
Respondent(s)
Saritha Advocate - THATTATHUMALA S ANILKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 31-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 15-09-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: Both petitions filed by the accused under Sections 94 and 348 of BNSS were dismissed. The court held that the death certificate of the complainant's father was irrelevant to the case and that the accused had ample opportunity to challenge the source of funds during cross-examination but failed to do so. The court also rejected the request to reopen defence evidence and summon witnesses, finding no valid reason warranting such reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Both petitions filed by the accused under Sections 94 and 348 of BNSS were dismissed. The court held that the death certificate of the complainant's father was irrelevant to the case and that the accused had ample opportunity to challenge the source of funds during cross-examination but failed to do so. The court also rejected the request to reopen defence evidence and summon witnesses, finding no valid reason warranting such reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts