SHO,ATTINGAL vs AKHIL — 401120/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,452,506(1),354,34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV440018012017
Filing Number
401120/2017
Filing Date
07-07-2017
Registration No
401120/2017
Registration Date
07-07-2017
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Attingal
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
2121
Police Station
Attingal Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO,ATTINGAL
Respondent(s)
AKHIL
MANU
BABU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Disposed
For further hearing
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 03-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial I Class Magistrate-I, Attingal acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 452, 506(i), 354, and 34 on March 31, 2026. The court found critical discrepancies in prosecution evidence, including conflicting accounts about the weapon used, inability to explain how witnesses identified the accused despite claiming no prior acquaintance, and lack of proof for several charged offenses. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial I Class Magistrate-I, Attingal acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 452, 506(i), 354, and 34 on March 31, 2026. The court found critical discrepancies in prosecution evidence, including conflicting accounts about the weapon used, inability to explain how witnesses identified the accused despite claiming no prior acquaintance, and lack of proof for several charged offenses. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts