SHO ATTINGAL vs Shilal — 400593/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV440005702018
Filing Number
400593/2018
Filing Date
03-05-2018
Registration No
400593/2018
Registration Date
03-05-2018
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Attingal
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1640
Police Station
Attingal Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) ATTINGAL
Respondent(s)
Shilal
Abdulvahid
Adv. SWAPNA T,SWAPNA T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Issue Bailable Warrant
For settlement
Appearance of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 27-01-2026 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
| 13-01-2026 | For settlement |
| 08-01-2026 | Appearance of Accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Attingal Magistrate Court acquitted two accused (Shilal and Abdul Vahid) of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty to spouse) and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant wife) retracted her statement, admitting the incidents never occurred and that her FIS was given due to her mental state at that time, with the matter having been settled between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Attingal Magistrate Court acquitted two accused (Shilal and Abdul Vahid) of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty to spouse) and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant wife) retracted her statement, admitting the incidents never occurred and that her FIS was given due to her mental state at that time, with the matter having been settled between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts