State of Kerala (Police) vs MARKSIN Advocate - L. SANDHYA — 16/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,118(1),296(b),351(2),110,118(1),296(b),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 30th March 2026.
Cr.No(TVM-PS-Attingal) - Attingal Police Station
CNR: KLTV440001572026
e-Filing Number
10-01-2026
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Attingal
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Attingal Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
MARKSIN Advocate - L. SANDHYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I ATTINGAL
Disposed
Verify and report
Call on
Appearance of Accused
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Verify and report |
| 17-03-2026 | Call on |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance of Accused |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Attingal committed the case against Marksin to the Sessions Court at Thiruvananthapuram under Section 232 BNSS, finding that the offences alleged (sections 110, 118(1), 296(b) & 351(2) of BNS) are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The accused is charged with uttering obscene words, assaulting the complainant with a wooden stick causing hurt, and attempting further assault with knowledge that death could result, constituting culpable homicide not amounting to murder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Attingal committed the case against Marksin to the Sessions Court at Thiruvananthapuram under Section 232 BNSS, finding that the offences alleged (sections 110, 118(1), 296(b) & 351(2) of BNS) are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The accused is charged with uttering obscene words, assaulting the complainant with a wooden stick causing hurt, and attempting further assault with knowledge that death could result, constituting culpable homicide not amounting to murder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts