Dr.Suresh Kumar vs Thonnakkal Service Co-operative bank — 300489/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Report on mediation Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV430006132022

Filing Number

607/2022

Filing Date

17-Oct-2022

Registration No

300489/2022

Registration Date

17-Oct-2022

Court

Munsiff Court Attingal

Judge

1-Munsiff Attingal

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr.Suresh Kumar

    Adv. Mangalapuram S Shibu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thonnakkal Service Co-operative bank

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff Attingal

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff Attingal

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Attingal

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Attingal

  6. 22-Sep-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Attingal

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Attingal

  8. 22-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Attingal

  9. 15-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Attingal

  10. 08-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff Attingal

  11. 15-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Attingal

  12. 19-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Attingal

  13. 13-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Attingal

  14. 19-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Attingal

  15. 17-Jun-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff Attingal

  16. 04-Nov-2022

    Order

  17. 04-Nov-2022

    Order

    SUMMARY: The petition for interim injunction was allowed. The court restrained the defendant (Thonnakkal Service Co-operative Bank) and its men from constructing anything on their property without leaving sufficient setback from the plaintiff's property, trespassing into the plaintiff's property, or disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the land. The court found prima facie evidence of possible trespass and held that the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 04-Nov-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff Attingal

  19. 26-Oct-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff Attingal

  20. 20-Oct-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff Attingal

  21. 17-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 17-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300489/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition for interim injunction was allowed. The court restrained the defendant (Thonnakkal Service Co-operative Bank) and its men from constructing anything on their property without leaving sufficient setback from the plaintiff's property, trespassing into the plaintiff's property, or disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the land. The court found prima facie evidence of possible trespass and held that the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case