G Vijayadharan vs G Babu — 300240/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 23rd September 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV430004412023
Filing Number
300240/2023
Filing Date
20-May-2023
Registration No
300240/2023
Registration Date
20-May-2023
Court
Munsiff Court Attingal
Judge
1-Munsiff Attingal
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G Vijayadharan
-
2.Dr.K G Santhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.G Babu
-
2.T K Geetha
-
3.Brijith lal
-
4.Rahman
-
5.Sheeba Beevi M
-
6.Shameer A
Case History
-
23-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jul-2026
Await report
Munsiff Attingal
-
26-May-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff Attingal
-
04-Mar-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff Attingal
-
13-Jan-2026
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
17-Dec-2025
Issues
Munsiff Attingal
-
16-Sep-2025
Issues
Munsiff Attingal
-
18-Jun-2025
Issues
Munsiff Attingal
-
13-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Attingal
-
12-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Attingal
-
25-Sep-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff Attingal
-
26-Jul-2024
Call with claim petition
Munsiff Attingal
-
06-Jun-2024
Call with claim petition
Munsiff Attingal
-
25-Mar-2024
Call with claim petition
Munsiff Attingal
-
24-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff Attingal
-
07-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff Attingal
-
10-Jan-2024
No sitting notified
Munsiff Attingal
-
10-Oct-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
11-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Attingal
-
05-Aug-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
06-Jul-2023
OrderView PDF
-
06-Jul-2023
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 300240/2023 The Munsiff Court in Attingal dismissed the petitioners' application for injunctive relief regarding a shared pathway. The petitioners claimed a right to use a six-link-wide southern pathway as part of their common tenement property; defendants contended the pathway was private and the petitioners had direct access via the western public road. The court found the petitioners had not established a prima facie case for restraint of access, noting they have maintained western road access since 2004. A status quo order was issued pending trial to adjudicate the parties' rights over the pathway; case adjourned to 05.08.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jul-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
30-Jun-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
20-Jun-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
08-Jun-2023
Call on
Munsiff Attingal
-
20-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 300240/2023
Case Summary: 300240/2023 The Munsiff Court in Attingal dismissed the petitioners' application for injunctive relief regarding a shared pathway. The petitioners claimed a right to use a six-link-wide southern pathway as part of their common tenement property; defendants contended the pathway was private and the petitioners had direct access via the western public road. The court found the petitioners had not established a prima facie case for restraint of access, noting they have maintained western road access since 2004. A status quo order was issued pending trial to adjudicate the parties' rights over the pathway; case adjourned to 05.08.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts