Radha vs Rugmini — 300575/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV430000042008
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
575/2008
Filing Date
20-12-2008
Registration No
300575/2008
Registration Date
20-12-2008
Court
Munsiff Court Attingal
Judge
1-MUNSIFF ATTINGAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Radha
Adv. K. S. Vinod
Sudhambika
Sheela
Sheeja
Respondent(s)
Rugmini
Suresh Babu
Sathyabhama
Adv. Suseelan.G
Prasad
Adv. Suseelan.G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF ATTINGAL
Pre trial steps
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Pre trial steps |
| 04-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 26-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: IA No. 11/2022 in OS No. 575/2008 | Munsiff Court, Attingal | 13 January 2025 Outcome: The review petition was allowed. The court found an error apparent on the face of the previous order (dated 31-05-2022) that dismissed an application to remit back the commissioner's report and property survey plan. The court determined that filing a remit petition itself constitutes an objection to the report, making the prior dismissal reasoning erroneous. The commissioner's report and plans have been remitted back for fresh inquiry with directions to measure properties according to old and new survey records and subdivision sketches, with additional compensation of Rs. 2,000 to the commissioner and Rs. 1,000 to the surveyor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: IA No. 11/2022 in OS No. 575/2008 | Munsiff Court, Attingal | 13 January 2025 Outcome: The review petition was allowed. The court found an error apparent on the face of the previous order (dated 31-05-2022) that dismissed an application to remit back the commissioner's report and property survey plan. The court determined that filing a remit petition itself constitutes an objection to the report, making the prior dismissal reasoning erroneous. The commissioner's report and plans have been remitted back for fresh inquiry with directions to measure properties according to old and new survey records and subdivision sketches, with additional compensation of Rs. 2,000 to the commissioner and Rs. 1,000 to the surveyor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts