Varghese varghese vs Nithya Anil REP BY POA Bijesh Advocate - SAJ S SIVAN — 200050/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For reports. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV420001842015
Filing Number
201714/2015
Filing Date
24-Jun-2015
Registration No
200050/2015
Registration Date
24-Jun-2015
Court
Sub Court Attingal
Judge
1-Sub Judge Attingal
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Varghese varghese
Adv. BENCY S
-
2.Power of Attorney holder Thomas mathew
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nithya Anil REP BY POA Bijesh Advocate - SAJ S SIVAN
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
For reports
Sub Judge Attingal
-
07-Jan-2026
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
07-Oct-2025
For reports
Sub Judge Attingal
-
15-Sep-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
11-Sep-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
05-Aug-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
04-Aug-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
24-Jun-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
20-May-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
20-Mar-2025
For reports
Sub Judge Attingal
-
10-Mar-2025
Return of summons
Sub Judge Attingal
-
06-Mar-2025
Call on
Sub Judge Attingal
-
25-Feb-2025
Restored
Sub Judge Attingal
-
25-Feb-2025
Adjourned
Sub Judge Attingal
-
25-Feb-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Sub Judge Attingal
-
03-Oct-2022
Order
Summary: In Original Suit No. 50/2015 before the Sub Judge, Attingal, the suit was dismissed for default on 3rd October 2022. The plaintiff failed to appear and adduced no evidence, while the defendant was present. Interim Application 2/22 was also dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Oct-2022
Disposed
Sub Judge Attingal
-
30-Jul-2022
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
26-Jul-2022
For reports
Sub Judge Attingal
-
19-Jul-2022
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
11-Jul-2022
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
05-Jul-2022
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
10-Jun-2022
Listed to
Sub Judge Attingal
-
01-Jun-2022
Pre trial steps
Sub Judge Attingal
-
21-Mar-2022
Bcf and steps
Sub Judge Attingal
-
28-Feb-2022
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
08-Feb-2022
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
17-Jan-2022
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
03-Jan-2022
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
07-Dec-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
10-Nov-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
20-Oct-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
23-Sep-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
01-Sep-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
05-Aug-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
26-Jul-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge Attingal
-
06-Jul-2021
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
21-May-2021
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
25-Jan-2021
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
01-Dec-2020
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
09-Sep-2020
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
10-Jun-2020
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
20-Mar-2020
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
25-Jan-2020
Issues
Sub Judge Attingal
-
16-Oct-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
14-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
11-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
14-Jan-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
13-Sep-2018
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
16-Jul-2018
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
12-Mar-2018
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
21-Nov-2017
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
11-Aug-2017
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
13-Jun-2017
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
16-Feb-2017
Written Statement
-
03-Dec-2016
Written Statement
-
04-Oct-2016
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
27-May-2016
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
17-Feb-2016
Written Statement
Sub Judge Attingal
-
16-Oct-2015
Return of notice
Sub Judge Attingal
-
24-Jun-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 200050/2015
Summary: In Original Suit No. 50/2015 before the Sub Judge, Attingal, the suit was dismissed for default on 3rd October 2022. The plaintiff failed to appear and adduced no evidence, while the defendant was present. Interim Application 2/22 was also dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts