The SHO, Vithura PS vs Abdul Rasheed, S/o Abdul Aziz — 8000556/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 269. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 04th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTV390022952023

Case disposed

Filing Number

20251/2023

Filing Date

14-08-2023

Registration No

8000556/2023

Registration Date

14-08-2023

Court

JFMC FOREST Nedumangad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

04th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

FIR Details

FIR Number

596

Police Station

Vithura Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 269
Police Act, 1960 (Kerala) Section 118(e)
Epidemic Diseases Act Section 4(2)(f)r/w5
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Withdrawal Petition Section The SHO, Vithura PSAbdul Rasheed, S/o Abdul Aziz
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Withdrawal Petition Section The SHO, Vithura PSAbdul Rasheed, S/o Abdul Aziz

Petitioner(s)

The SHO (Station House Officer), Vithura PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Abdul Rasheed, S/o Abdul Aziz

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

04-03-2026

Disposed

22-01-2026

Issue Summons

30-10-2025

Issue Summons

17-07-2025

Issue Summons

07-04-2025

Issue Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

04-03-2026
Judgement
04-03-2026
Judgement
04-03-2026
Judgement

The Nedumangad Forest Magistrate Court discharged accused Abdul Rasheed under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code, accepting the Assistant Public Prosecutor's application for withdrawal of prosecution. The court found the charges—related to violating COVID-19 regulations by not wearing a mask or maintaining social distance—to be of a petty nature and determined that withdrawal was in good faith and in the interests of public policy and justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nedumangad Forest Magistrate Court discharged accused Abdul Rasheed under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code, accepting the Assistant Public Prosecutor's application for withdrawal of prosecution. The court found the charges—related to violating COVID-19 regulations by not wearing a mask or maintaining social distance—to be of a petty nature and determined that withdrawal was in good faith and in the interests of public policy and justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFMC FOREST Nedumangad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case