The SHO, Vithura PS vs Anshad, S/o Abdul Rasheed — 8000543/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,269. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 12th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV390022092023
Filing Number
20165/2023
Filing Date
09-08-2023
Registration No
8000543/2023
Registration Date
09-08-2023
Court
JFMC FOREST Nedumangad
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
FIR Details
FIR Number
681
Police Station
Vithura Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer), Vithura PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anshad, S/o Abdul Rasheed
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Issue Summons
Issue Summons
Issue Summons
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-01-2026 | Issue Summons |
| 30-10-2025 | Issue Summons |
| 17-07-2025 | Issue Summons |
| 07-04-2025 | Issue Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial I Class Magistrate Court for the trial of Forest Offences, Nedumangad discharged the accused Anshad under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court granted the Assistant Public Prosecutor's application to withdraw prosecution for violating epidemic control regulations (not wearing a mask/maintaining social distance), finding the application made in good faith and considering the petty nature of the offences under IPC sections 188, 269, KP Act section 118(e), and KEDO section 4(2)(f). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial I Class Magistrate Court for the trial of Forest Offences, Nedumangad discharged the accused Anshad under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court granted the Assistant Public Prosecutor's application to withdraw prosecution for violating epidemic control regulations (not wearing a mask/maintaining social distance), finding the application made in good faith and considering the petty nature of the offences under IPC sections 188, 269, KP Act section 118(e), and KEDO section 4(2)(f). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts