Remakumari vs Anshad Advocate - RENJU BHASKAR — 501415/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 279 BNSS on 25th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV360048202016
Filing Number
501415/2016
Filing Date
20-Mar-2017
Registration No
501415/2016
Registration Date
20-Mar-2017
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 279 BNSS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Remakumari
Adv. MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anshad Advocate - RENJU BHASKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: CC1415/2016 Court Decision: The accused Anshad was acquitted and found not guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the complainant failed to establish essential ingredients of the offense—namely, that the accused issued the cheque and that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties. Key Reasoning: The defence produced evidence from the State Bank of Travancore's branch manager proving the cheque was issued by a different person (Anwar) to a different account. Signature analysis revealed material discrepancies between the cheque signatures and the accused's signatures on court documents, further undermining the complainant's case. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear for cross-examination after her initial testimony, weakening the prosecution's position. The bail bond was cancelled and the accused released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
19-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Jan-2026
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Dec-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Nov-2025
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
09-Oct-2025
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Jul-2025
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
20-Jun-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-May-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Apr-2025
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Jan-2025
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Oct-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-May-2024
By Notification to
-
12-Apr-2024
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Mar-2024
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Feb-2024
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Dec-2023
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Sep-2023
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Sep-2023
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Aug-2023
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-Aug-2023
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
05-Jul-2023
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-May-2023
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
28-Mar-2023
Appearance of Petitioner
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Feb-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
14-Feb-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Feb-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-Feb-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
02-Feb-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Jan-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
16-Jan-2023
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Dec-2022
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
09-May-2022
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Apr-2022
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Apr-2022
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
16-Sep-2021
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
12-May-2021
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Nov-2020
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
18-Jun-2020
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
28-Dec-2019
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Nov-2019
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-May-2019
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
02-Feb-2019
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
20-Oct-2018
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
15-Sep-2018
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
04-Aug-2018
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Mar-2018
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
21-Oct-2017
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 501415/2016
Case Summary: CC1415/2016 Court Decision: The accused Anshad was acquitted and found not guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the complainant failed to establish essential ingredients of the offense—namely, that the accused issued the cheque and that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties. Key Reasoning: The defence produced evidence from the State Bank of Travancore's branch manager proving the cheque was issued by a different person (Anwar) to a different account. Signature analysis revealed material discrepancies between the cheque signatures and the accused's signatures on court documents, further undermining the complainant's case. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear for cross-examination after her initial testimony, weakening the prosecution's position. The bail bond was cancelled and the accused released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts