THANKACHI vs AKHIL — 500157/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLTV360043612024
e-Filing Number
28-12-2024
Filing Number
1183/2024
Filing Date
31-Dec-2024
Registration No
500157/2024
Registration Date
31-Dec-2024
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Nedumangadu Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THANKACHI
Adv. RAMYA R NAIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.AKHIL
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-May-2026
For Appearance Of Jd
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
08-May-2026
For Appearance Of Jd
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-May-2026
For appearence of Complainant
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-May-2026
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Apr-2026
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Apr-2026
For Objection and hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
08-Apr-2026
For Objection and hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-Mar-2026
Interim OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Interim OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was allowed. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the petitioner (mother) was an aggrieved person subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (her son and daughter-in-law). The court granted a protection order prohibiting the respondents from committing domestic violence, threatening, intimidating, or harassing the petitioner, and directed the first respondent (son) to vacate the shared household until final disposal of the case. Both parties were ordered to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
20-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Feb-2026
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
29-Jan-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Jan-2026
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
21-Jan-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Jan-2026
For Orders in Ea
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Jan-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
09-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
08-Jan-2026
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
24-Dec-2025
Appearance of Petitioner
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
28-Nov-2025
For settlement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
14-Nov-2025
For settlement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
03-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Sep-2025
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
18-Jul-2025
Await report
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-Apr-2025
Return of notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 500157/2024
Summary: The petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was allowed. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the petitioner (mother) was an aggrieved person subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (her son and daughter-in-law). The court granted a protection order prohibiting the respondents from committing domestic violence, threatening, intimidating, or harassing the petitioner, and directed the first respondent (son) to vacate the shared household until final disposal of the case. Both parties were ordered to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts