GIRIJA D/O KAMALAMMA vs SINDHU KUMARI D/O GIRIJA — 500038/2021

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: By Notification to. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLTV360042812021

By Notification to

Next Hearing

26th June 2026

Filing Number

500038/2021

Filing Date

08-04-2021

Registration No

500038/2021

Registration Date

08-04-2021

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Crl.MP/3152/2025 Classification : Petition Section GIRIJA D/O KAMALAMMASINDHU KUMARI D/O GIRIJA
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section GIRIJA D/O KAMALAMMA

Petitioner(s)

GIRIJA D/O KAMALAMMA

Respondent(s)

SINDHU KUMARI D/O GIRIJA

ANIL KUMAR S/O RAMAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

25-05-2026

By Notification to

08-05-2026

for evidence.

27-03-2026

for evidence.

13-03-2026

for evidence.

30-01-2026

By Notification to

Interim Orders

28-05-2024
Judgement

Case Summary: 500038/2021 Petition Allowed. The court granted Girija (petitioner/elderly mother) comprehensive protection under the Domestic Violence Act against her daughter Sindhu Kumari and son-in-law Anil Kumar. The court restrained respondents from committing domestic violence, contacting petitioner via phone/electronic media, alienating shared household assets, and harassing petitioner's dependents. Respondents ordered to pay costs. Case decided ex-parte as respondents failed to appear despite notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 500038/2021 Petition Allowed. The court granted Girija (petitioner/elderly mother) comprehensive protection under the Domestic Violence Act against her daughter Sindhu Kumari and son-in-law Anil Kumar. The court restrained respondents from committing domestic violence, contacting petitioner via phone/electronic media, alienating shared household assets, and harassing petitioner's dependents. Respondents ordered to pay costs. Case decided ex-parte as respondents failed to appear despite notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case