State of Kerala vs Ratheesh S/O Raveendran Advocate - ASHOK K S — 500084/2024

Case under Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,23. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLTV360030592024

Await report

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

5074663/2024

Filing Date

30-08-2024

Registration No

500084/2024

Registration Date

30-08-2024

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,23
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Ratheesh S/O Raveendran

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala

Adv. Shabu Sukumaran, Shabu Sukumaran

Rishika D/O Rajeswari

Adv. SANDHYA K NAIR,ASHOK K S Shefin Tzvi

Respondent(s)

Ratheesh S/O Raveendran Advocate - ASHOK K S

B Kumari

Adv. ASHOK K S

Raveendran

Adv. ASHOK K S

Resmi

Manu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

05-06-2026

Await report

19-05-2026

for evidence.

18-05-2026

Orders in IA

15-05-2026

Appearance Of Parties

13-03-2026

for evidence.

Interim Orders

19-05-2026
Interim Order

Case Summary: 500084/2024 Petition Allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate II, Nedumangad granted interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 to Rajeswari (wife) and her child Rishika under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent Ratheesh was directed to pay the amount on or before June 5, 2026. The respondent's counsel did not raise serious objections and only requested time for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 500084/2024 Petition Allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate II, Nedumangad granted interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 to Rajeswari (wife) and her child Rishika under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent Ratheesh was directed to pay the amount on or before June 5, 2026. The respondent's counsel did not raise serious objections and only requested time for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case