Dhanamjai Nidhi Ltd vs Bindhu V G — 2249/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Sec 138 and 142. Status: Not in the list. Next hearing: 19th August 2026.

Not in the list Next hearing 19-Aug-2026 in 2 weeks

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLTV360022292025

Filing Number

2249/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

2249/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Sec 138 and 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhanamjai Nidhi Ltd

    Adv. LEKSHMI GIREESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bindhu V G

Case History

  1. 19-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Not in the list

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition for condonation of delay in filing a cheque dishonor complaint (under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) was allowed. The court accepted the complainant's explanation that the delay resulted from bona fide administrative reasons—specifically, misplacement of cheques during office furniture rearrangement—and found the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. The accused did not file any objection despite being served notice, and the court determined that refusing condonation would cause irreparable prejudice to the complainant while no prejudice was shown to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Return of notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Return of notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad

  7. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2249/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for condonation of delay in filing a cheque dishonor complaint (under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) was allowed. The court accepted the complainant's explanation that the delay resulted from bona fide administrative reasons—specifically, misplacement of cheques during office furniture rearrangement—and found the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. The accused did not file any objection despite being served notice, and the court determined that refusing condonation would cause irreparable prejudice to the complainant while no prejudice was shown to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case