Joy @ Jayan vs Ushas Kumar — 500118/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,506(i)and34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 27th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV360017622015
Filing Number
514011/2015
Filing Date
31-Jan-2015
Registration No
500118/2015
Registration Date
31-Jan-2015
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1476
Police Station
Nedumangadu Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Joy @ Jayan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ushas Kumar
-
2.Shani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: CC.118/2015 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Nedumangad acquitted both accused (Ushus Kumar and Shani) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 341, 323, and 506(1) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible eyewitness testimony—the two occurrence witnesses gave contradictory versions, and the injured complainant was deceased. Key Reasoning: Although the investigation officer provided documentary evidence (FIR, scene mahazar, wound certificate), the court found these records insufficient without direct corroboration from occurrence witnesses. The absence of reliable witness testimony meant the prosecution could not establish the alleged assault, abusive language, wrongful restraint, and death threats occurring on 8 November 2014 at Attukal. Accordingly, both accused were released and their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Mar-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Mar-2026
For appearance of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence closed. Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
10-Feb-2026
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
14-Jan-2026
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
08-Dec-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
19-Nov-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Oct-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Aug-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Jul-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Jun-2025
For appearance of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
15-Apr-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
05-Feb-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Nov-2024
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Aug-2024
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
07-Feb-2024
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
29-Jul-2023
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
28-Jul-2023
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-May-2023
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Feb-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
28-Dec-2022
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
03-Dec-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
09-Nov-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Oct-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Aug-2022
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Aug-2022
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Jul-2022
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
27-Jul-2022
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Jul-2022
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
16-Jun-2022
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
25-Oct-2021
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
23-Jul-2021
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
22-Mar-2021
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
15-Mar-2021
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
02-Dec-2020
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
02-Jun-2020
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
20-Nov-2019
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
26-Jun-2019
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
14-Feb-2019
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
31-Oct-2018
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Jul-2018
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Jan-2018
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
11-Aug-2017
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
17-Feb-2017
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
18-Jan-2017
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
08-Jul-2016
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
05-Jul-2016
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
16-Mar-2016
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
03-Dec-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 500118/2015
Case Summary: CC.118/2015 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Nedumangad acquitted both accused (Ushus Kumar and Shani) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 341, 323, and 506(1) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible eyewitness testimony—the two occurrence witnesses gave contradictory versions, and the injured complainant was deceased. Key Reasoning: Although the investigation officer provided documentary evidence (FIR, scene mahazar, wound certificate), the court found these records insufficient without direct corroboration from occurrence witnesses. The absence of reliable witness testimony meant the prosecution could not establish the alleged assault, abusive language, wrongful restraint, and death threats occurring on 8 November 2014 at Attukal. Accordingly, both accused were released and their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts