Kscb vs Madhusoodhanan S Advocate - ATHUL BABU S R — 500998/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLTV360005382024
e-Filing Number
27-01-2023
Filing Number
500534/2024
Filing Date
01-Mar-2024
Registration No
500998/2024
Registration Date
01-Mar-2024
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kscb
Adv. MANOJ P G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Madhusoodhanan S Advocate - ATHUL BABU S R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court dismissed a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after the complainant bank sought withdrawal, stating the matter was settled between parties and submitting a loan closure letter as evidence. The accused was acquitted and set at liberty under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 BNSS, as the court found no further inquiry necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
20-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
13-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Oct-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
06-Jun-2025
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
30-Dec-2024
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
05-Aug-2024
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
03-Aug-2024
By Notification to
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Nedumangad
-
12-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 500998/2024
The court dismissed a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after the complainant bank sought withdrawal, stating the matter was settled between parties and submitting a loan closure letter as evidence. The accused was acquitted and set at liberty under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 BNSS, as the court found no further inquiry necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts