Rejani D/o. Kumari Omana vs Vipin.V. Nair S/o. Vijayakumar Nair — 400168/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 341, 323,324 & 354. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTV350008572020

for evidence.

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

400168/2020

Filing Date

12-03-2020

Registration No

400168/2020

Registration Date

12-03-2020

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Nedumangadu

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I NEDUMANGAD

FIR Details

FIR Number

157

Police Station

Venjaramood Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 294(b), 341, 323,324 & 354
Crl.MP/6171/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Rejani D/o. Kumari OmanaVipin.V. Nair S/o. Vijayakumar Nair
Crl.MP/6186/2025 Classification : Petition Section Rejani D/o. Kumari OmanaVipin.V. Nair S/o. Vijayakumar Nair

Petitioner(s)

Rejani D/o. Kumari Omana

Respondent(s)

Vipin.V. Nair S/o. Vijayakumar Nair

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I NEDUMANGAD

13-03-2026

for evidence.

31-12-2025

call on

12-12-2025

For evidence

03-09-2025

For evidence

21-05-2025

Issue Summons

Interim Orders

31-12-2025
Order

Case Summary: Vipin V. Nair v. State (CC 168/2020) Petition Allowed. The court granted accused Vipin V. Nair permission to renew his passport and travel abroad for two years, and exempted him from personal court appearance during this period, subject to strict conditions including a written undertaking not to dispute his identity, counsel representation at all hearings, and no adjournments on his behalf. The court noted his employment offer in Dubai requires valid passport and applied Section 317 CrPC with safeguards against trial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vipin V. Nair v. State (CC 168/2020) Petition Allowed. The court granted accused Vipin V. Nair permission to renew his passport and travel abroad for two years, and exempted him from personal court appearance during this period, subject to strict conditions including a written undertaking not to dispute his identity, counsel representation at all hearings, and no adjournments on his behalf. The court noted his employment offer in Dubai requires valid passport and applied Section 317 CrPC with safeguards against trial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case