Syamala vs Sarasamma — 300080/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
RP - Restoration Petition.
CNR: KLTV340009502024
e-Filing Number
04-11-2024
Filing Number
1261/2024
Filing Date
04-Nov-2024
Registration No
300080/2024
Registration Date
04-Nov-2024
Court
Munsiff Court Nedumangadu
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Syamala
Adv. PRIYA R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarasamma
-
2.Anil kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
The Additional Munsiff Court at Nedumangad heard Revision Petition 80/2024 on March 13, 2026, concerning Original Suit 12/2011 between Syamala (petitioner/defendant) and Sarasamma and Anil Kumar (respondents/plaintiffs). The court ordered the restoration of Original Suit 12/2011, with both parties having paid costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
28-Feb-2026
Payment of cost
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
18-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
19-Jan-2026
Call on
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
07-Jan-2026
Objection
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
20-Nov-2025
Objection
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
29-Oct-2025
No sitting notified
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
18-Aug-2025
For Steps
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
05-Jul-2025
No sitting notified
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
29-Mar-2025
Return of notice
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
30-Jan-2025
Return of notice
Additional Munsiff Nedumangad
-
04-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 300080/2024
The Additional Munsiff Court at Nedumangad heard Revision Petition 80/2024 on March 13, 2026, concerning Original Suit 12/2011 between Syamala (petitioner/defendant) and Sarasamma and Anil Kumar (respondents/plaintiffs). The court ordered the restoration of Original Suit 12/2011, with both parties having paid costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts