Lathakumari A S vs Sunil K Advocate - DEEPU KRISHNAN, DEEPU KRISHNAN — 300009/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 13th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV340000092024
e-Filing Number
04-01-2024
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
04-01-2024
Registration No
300009/2024
Registration Date
04-01-2024
Court
Munsiff Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF NEDUMANGAD
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lathakumari A S
Adv. SAJEEV S R
Geetha Devi A S
Adv. SAJEEV S R
Respondent(s)
Sunil K Advocate - DEEPU KRISHNAN, DEEPU KRISHNAN
Vinayan S
Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Sreejith V
Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Arun
Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Ajayakumar N
Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Sreerag
Adv. MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Krishnan Nair
Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Manoj
Adv. DEEPU U V,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF NEDUMANGAD
Disposed
Declared Holidays
Call on
Call on
84-85 Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-01-2026 | Declared Holidays |
| 10-12-2025 | Call on |
| 15-10-2025 | Call on |
| 23-08-2025 | 84-85 Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS 09/2024 The suit filed by Lathakumari A S and Geetha Devi A S against eight defendants in the Principal Munsiff Court, Nedumangad, was dismissed on 13 March 2026. The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs' counsel indicated the suit was not being pressed, and no substantive hearing on merits took place. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 09/2024 The suit filed by Lathakumari A S and Geetha Devi A S against eight defendants in the Principal Munsiff Court, Nedumangad, was dismissed on 13 March 2026. The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs' counsel indicated the suit was not being pressed, and no substantive hearing on merits took place. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts