Lathakumari A S vs Sunil K Advocate - DEEPU KRISHNAN, DEEPU KRISHNAN — 300009/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 13th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV340000092024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-01-2024

Filing Number

15/2024

Filing Date

04-01-2024

Registration No

300009/2024

Registration Date

04-01-2024

Court

Munsiff Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF NEDUMANGAD

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Lathakumari A S

Adv. SAJEEV S R

Geetha Devi A S

Adv. SAJEEV S R

Respondent(s)

Sunil K Advocate - DEEPU KRISHNAN, DEEPU KRISHNAN

Vinayan S

Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Sreejith V

Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Arun

Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Ajayakumar N

Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Sreerag

Adv. MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Krishnan Nair

Adv. DEEPU KRISHNAN,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Manoj

Adv. DEEPU U V,MOHAN KUMAR KIRAN S Y

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF NEDUMANGAD

13-03-2026

Disposed

15-01-2026

Declared Holidays

10-12-2025

Call on

15-10-2025

Call on

23-08-2025

84-85 Steps

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: OS 09/2024 The suit filed by Lathakumari A S and Geetha Devi A S against eight defendants in the Principal Munsiff Court, Nedumangad, was dismissed on 13 March 2026. The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs' counsel indicated the suit was not being pressed, and no substantive hearing on merits took place. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 09/2024 The suit filed by Lathakumari A S and Geetha Devi A S against eight defendants in the Principal Munsiff Court, Nedumangad, was dismissed on 13 March 2026. The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs' counsel indicated the suit was not being pressed, and no substantive hearing on merits took place. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case